David Paul speaking with a co-worker

Medical Negligence Arbitration

Man behind scales, stethoscope and gavel on desk

Florida Medical Negligence Arbitration Attorneys

Arbitration is a technique used to resolve legal disputes outside of the courts. During arbitration, the involved parties consult a third party to review the case. This third party is also referred to as arbitrators, arbiters, or an arbitral tribunal. The arbitrators then propose a binding or non-binding decision to settle the dispute. Arbitration is considered less formal than courtroom proceedings, but more formal than negotiation or mediation.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

HOW CAN WE HELP?

By submitting this form, you agree to receive communications from Paul Trial Group, including calls, emails, and text messages regarding your inquiry. Message and data rates may apply.

Types of Arbitration

An arbitration clause contained in a legal contract is most often the cause of arbitrations. Arbitration clauses require that contractual disputes are resolved using arbitration. Arbitration clauses may feature several types of conditions. These conditions may be simple or complex, with control over several aspects of the arbitration process.

Binding vs. Non-binding Arbitration

Binding arbitration asserts that the arbitrator’s decision will be final. Only in limited circumstances is a court eligible to review or overturn the decision. These scenarios may involve issues such as misuse of power or fraud.

Non-binding arbitration allows either involved party to reject the arbitrator’s award in place of a trial. Non-binding arbitration is often used to independently asses a potential lawsuit’s strengths and weaknesses. In some cases, the award may become binding if both parties agree or wait past a certain timeframe to revisit the case in court.

Voluntary vs. Mandatory Arbitration

Arbitration clauses may be voluntary or mandatory. Mandatory arbitration agreements require that arbitration must be used to solve certain types of disputes. This means that both parties involved forfeit their right to file a lawsuit in court, appeal an arbitrator’s decision, or participate in a related class action lawsuit.

Voluntary arbitration involves an agreement from both parties to submit a disagreement to arbitration after other resolution methods have been evaluated. Many consumers view this form of arbitration as more fair, as it presents arbitration as a choice instead of a legal necessity.

Arbitration Pros and Cons

Parties involved in a legal dispute may favor arbitration because:

  • The arbitration process may be faster than court litigation.
  • Businesses may find arbitration to be less expensive and more flexible.
  • Specially qualified arbitrators can be chosen for highly technical disputes, as opposed to litigation, where a judge cannot be selected by parties.
  • Proceedings and arbitral awards can often be made non-public and confidential.

Disadvantages of arbitration may include:

  • In some cases, arbitration is subject to pressures from more powerful law firms that represent the wealthier and stronger party.
  • If the arbitration process is binding and mandatory, the involved parties waive their rights of accessing courts and having a jury or judge decide the case.
  • Particularly in small consumer disputes, parties may be required to pay an additional cost for arbitrators.
  • There are limited avenues for decision appeal, making it difficult to overturn an unfavorable or erroneous decision.

Florida Arbitration Ruling

In June 2013, the Florida Supreme Court voided the arbitration agreement of a now-deceased medical malpractice patient. After Joseph Franks underwent surgery to remove a lump in his groin, he developed a large hematoma. He died 11 days after the operation.

Before his first visit to the facility, Franks signed a “financial agreement.” The mandatory agreement stated that binding arbitration would be used for any disputes. Furthermore, the agreement contained a clause limiting non-economic damages to $250,000.

Donna Franks, Joseph’s wife, filed a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of Franks’ estate. After two appeals, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the agreement contradicted public policy under the Medical Malpractice Act. This was because the agreement removed significant incentives for claimants who wish to agree to voluntary arbitration.

Selecting an Arbitrator

Arbitration agreements often designate JAMS, the American Arbitration Association, or the National Arbitration Forum to handle arbitration. These arbitrators are typically practicing attorneys or retired judges with extensive legal experience. Arbitration associations typically charge a percentage of the disputed amount or a set amount. Case service fees are also charged. Independent arbitrators may also be used.

Award-Winning Advocacy: David Paul and Scott Mcmillen Named 2025
"Lawyers of the Year"

Super Lawyers badge
The Best Lawyers In America Badge
American Board of Trial Advocates badge
ABPLA badge
Florida Trends Legal Elite badge
NBIA badge

What Our Clients Say


I highly recommend Paul Trial Group for your legal matters. Working with their team was really an exceptional experience even as I was going thru much duress.?Working with David Paul office you will get honesty, integrity and the truth. 

- Laura A.

Mr. Murphy provided excellent service. With his assistance, I finally got the closure I needed for an otherwise emotionally stressful event. I highly recommend this firm and Mr. Murphy .

- D. (former client)

I have had a professional relationship with David Paul for over a decade. Recently, I have worked mostly with Scott Murphy. I have found the attorneys to be experienced, thorough, intelligent, insightful, diligent, personable, and committed. I recommend this firm and its attorneys very highly, and without reservation.

- Sidney A.

David Paul represented me in a personal injury case. I feel so fortunate and blessed that I had them in my corner. They were overwhelmingly prepared in every stage of my case. They take a limited number of cases so that they can dedicate their time to you legally, as well as personally. My family & I can’t say enough positive things about him!

- John D.

David Paul and Olivia Kronenberg not only represented our family, they did also so with a very personal approach. They were extremely thorough and methodical in their investigation and how they presented our case. It was not a quick process, but they made it easy and painless. They kept us advised on every update. Our settlement was just, and we were rewarded with closure on my wife’s death.

- Skip Banfell

My attorney, Olivia, eased any worries and made an extremely emotional and stressful situation go as smoothly as possible. Everyone I worked with treated me like a friend, not just a client.

- Stan Stevens

This firm valued me as a person not just a client, they respected my wishes, concerns, questions and answers.

- Fredericka Epps

A very professional and great team that was amazing in helping me and my family through some really hard times. I never really trusted lawyers until I worked with Dave and Olivia and now I feel like we are more like family.

 

- Michelle

I absolutely love Olivia! She was transparent, honest, helpful, and treated my case the same way she would treat it if it were her family.

 

- Savanna Whidden

Philip Moring and his staff were highly professional, accommodating and a pleasure to work with. They always showed knowledge and thoroughness, while also being efficient and getting straight to the point. They made the entire experience pleasant, and I would highly recommend them if you or a loved one needs a competent and personable lawyer.

- Mary D.

How can we help?

If you believe something went wrong,
we can help you understand your options

Not every case is viable, and we are honest about that. If we believe we can help,
we will tell you. If not, we will explain why.

24 Hours / 7 Days a Week